The difference. TFM.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or create an account.
Obama: “I don’t really want to shake your nasty hand, so let’s just fist bump for the camera.”
You may be number one, but you smell like number two.
^I see what you did there.
^^^ He called the shit number two!
^ He called the poo shit.
A President who sees the poor as equals, just like Jesus would. FaF
Getting a shoe-shine by a poor on the runway in front of your G6. TRM
Getting a pineapple stuck up your ass on a daily basis would suck too.
Referring to a poor individual as “a poor”. TFM.
Marlboro Man is a poor with cancer of the lungs and eyes, and the cataracts make it difficult to read.
I’m sure he meant Total Romney Move. I hope you get ass fucked by a cactus, you piece of shit pledge.
Trickle down economics. FaF.
^This guy gets it.
Proven that it doesn’t work. TFM.
Fucking liberal. ^ NF
^It’s economics you fucking retard
^ Actually supply-side economics has a long and consistent record of success. If you read something other than the editorial page of the New York Times you’d know that.
The Times is liberal as shit. WSJ.
Ahhh, trickle down economics. Did ever occur to anyone that trickle down economics didnt work because the middle class was be choked by the government? You hear liberals complain that “the rich” pay too little taxes and need to be taxed more to pay their “fair share.” What if “the rich” are already paying their fair share and the middle class are just paying too much? What if the middle class just paid less too match the rich and then the government just fucking spend less? I hope im preaching to the choir.
In fact, it has been proven countless times that changing the marginal tax rate(supply side economics) doesn’t stimulate investment. Don’t take my word for it though, take a look for yourselves.
It’s pretty obvious there is no relation. Let us leave it at that.
Wow, did you really just use Rex Nutting as your source to “disprove” supply-side? Rex Nutting was the guy who claimed that Obama actually reduced federal spending while in office, a statement that was so absurd even liberal economists ridiculed it.
He may be downright wrong most times, but this time he’s not. This is a case where his argument is backed by government data. You can find it pretty much anywhere, here is another example.
Obama should be shining Romney’s shoes.
^^Ho boy this deserves a grand chuckle.
How many middle class Americans have had their shoes shined? And please, refrain from commenting about not being middle class. Every user on this site is middle class. The 1% don’t come to TFM to prove themselves. You can find them on the Forbes list.
You do know there’s a difference between being rich/poor and 1%/99%, right?
According to the DOL, having a household income north of about $400k puts you in the 1%. You really think no one on this site falls under that category?
^ Thank you.
Greeks usually come from wealthy families, so I don’t see the argument here. It wouldn’t surprise me if people on here are from the 20%-15%, or the 14-10%, even the 9-5%, or hell, even the top 5%. People affiliated with Greek life tend to be in these ranges. To my knowledge, this is not middle class.
I’d contend no less than 1% of the uses of this site are, in fact, the 1%.
Too bad they’re actually using a metal detector on Romney’s shoes.
If this photo wasn’t so shitty people might realize this
Yeah, I hate Obama as much as the next guy, but there’s nothing wrong with being nice to the janitor.
Congenial disposition goes far. It doesn’t hurt to treat others with respect. Reputation is what men and women think of us; character is what God knows of us.
IH. Great description FratUp! A true Fraternity Gentlemen is congenial to everyone. Even if they are doing your dirty work.
Boy, that escalated quickly…
I bet that “a poor” has been stealing shit out of offices for years….