SEC Expansion: The Biggest Winners

Email this to a friend

Nice Move

The ink is finally dry. Two former Big XII members have set sail for calmer waters and a more fertile, prosperous territory. As of Sunday, July 1, Missouri and Texas A&M are officially members of the SEC. They have left the conference they called home since 1994 (Big XII play didn’t begin until 1996). It was a young conference with troubled relationships, uneven revenue distribution, pointed fingers and hurt feelings, but it was one with deep roots and storied rivalries. The Tigers had to wave goodbye to their nemesis, Kansas, and the Aggies to the University of Texas. The move had better be worth it for these programs to turn their backs on so much tradition, but seeing as it’s the SEC, it certainly seems like the right call.

Obviously this is a big moment for these universities. It’s akin to getting the call up from triple A to the bigs. With the step up in competition and notoriety, each program will enjoy the many fruits of their esteemed membership, but they will also face new challenges.

So, now that the SEC has officially expanded, let’s discuss who the biggest winners are…

Missouri and Texas A&M

These two schools are making out like bandits. This is an across-the-board upgrade for them both. They are set to pull in way more money in a conference that shares revenue equally. SEC trucks filled with cash are headed to Columbia and College Station as we speak. To the contrary, the Big XII practiced uneven revenue distribution based on several factors, and the University of Texas cornered the market there. That’s certainly more of a capitalistic approach, but conference unrest can be the result, which was clearly the case in the Big XII. The SEC puts a lot of stock in conference stability, and that’s a welcomed notion for the Tigers and Aggies. For two summers they’ve found themselves in the center of rumors and speculation about realignment. They even watched former conference members Colorado and Nebraska pack their shit and move out. The catalyst for this discord was, of course, the aforementioned uneven revenue distribution. But this mild annoyance turned into full-on turmoil with the creation of the Longhorn Network, which not only puts more money into the pockets of the Longhorns, but provides them with constant program promotion on the back of ESPN (even though no one can see that God forsaken channel yet).

Finally, and most importantly, the Aggies and Tigers are joining the premier football conference in all the land. The quality of football, the game day atmospheres, the passion of the fans… it’s all better in the SEC. The conference boasts the last six national championship trophies. That’s big boy football. Conversely, like an MLB pitcher during the pinnacle of the steroid era, the competition for these new members just went from tough to damn near hopeless. We’re talking about two programs that had little to no success in the weaker Big XII, and now they’ll be going up against the best in our nation’s power league. You can bet it will be ugly, at least for a few transitional years.


Here’s exactly what the SEC is acquiring in Missouri and Texas A&M. The following are all-time statistics:


  • .544 winning percentage
  • 0 national titles
  • 15 conference titles
  • 13 bowl wins

Texas A&M

  • .598 winning percentage
  • 1 national title (1939)
  • 18 conference titles
  • 14 bowl wins

Given these numbers, does the move to allow A&M and Mizzou into the conference appear to be football motivated? Couldn’t they have pursued more relevant or historically rich programs in their region? Programs like Florida State, Virginia Tech or Miami? If not, why did the SEC lock these programs down? Are they the chosen sacrificial lambs? It’s big business, driven by money. It’s simple really: the more eyeballs on SEC football, the more valuable their product is and the revenue will follow suit. Missouri and Texas A&M conveniently reside in big market areas. Missouri brings TV sets from St. Louis and Kansas City, and Texas A&M will get people tuning in from Houston as well as parts of San Antonio, Austin and Dallas.

The biggest winners, in my opinion, are the existing members of the Southeastern Conference, at least for the foreseeable future. These members will reap the monetary benefits of expanded markets. They will also find two teams on their schedule that pose little threat. Again, that last part could be temporary, shifts in conference and program strength are always in motion.

Beginning this fall, A&M and Missouri will start the treacherous journey from the new, vulnerable, clean-cut kids in Cell Block D to revered legitimate conference players. It’s going to be a long, tough ride that will probably leave each program begging for mercy at times. But hey… at least now they’re in the SEC.

Follow me on Twitter @RogerDornTFM

Dillon Cheverere

Dillon Cheverere (@RogerJDorn) is the Vice President of Media for Grandex, Inc. He's a native Texan with a full head of hair and knows his way around a nice box of red wine. Dorn graduated (BBA) with a GPA sitting in the meaty part of the bell curve, not lagging behind, but not trying to show off, either. Golf is his game now. He's long off the tee but can't putt for shit. Email:

More From Dillon Cheverere »


You must be logged in to comment. Log in or create an account.

  1. 8
    ice cold frat

    I come before you today sickened. Disgusted. I look back and I see our greatest achievements, the victory of frat over geed and hipster. I look forward and I see the ultimate testament to Fraternity life and the TFTC attitude. But no, it shall not be. I am surrounded by traitors and cowards.
    Did you all forget when that son of a fucking bitch Dorn, with gleeful orgasmic joy, posted that column berating your college’s football program for their recruiting achievements? Perhaps when he invented the infamous “Dorning”? Oh but if only he was a mere asshole tyrant constantly trying to prove himself, he is also a corrupt, biased, immoral bastard who should have no place on the TFM staff.
    Intern, what did Dorn promise you? Will TFM now be immune to shitty trolls, as opposed to the main recipient of them? Is frat forever secure now? Lifetime servitude with you as lifetime bitch, was that the deal you goddamn traitor? I’m sure StuffFratsLike and Sterling Cooper, the since befallen contributor, will be happy to play along.
    Bacon, what say you? Coward, you and your followers shall burn in hell. For a team that once stood against tyranny, you now join your enemy? What say you RageTheory? Will you permit these senseless language censors and oppression of free speech and Fraternity life as we know it?
    To the people of TFM, your choice has been made. You are all worthless fucking goddamn cowards. Little we know the Ultimate Frat Move, the famous unposted butt-pee picture, is but a farce and false god created by the demon lord himself, DORN. He keeps you ens.laved with thoughts of greatness while undermining your ability to frat hard. You choose Dorn’s fa.ggotry; bowing down to him because it’s easier, less scary than my call to fight? You’d rather be s.laves, bitches, whores, playthings, and possession, rather than risk your try-hard version of frat? Fuck you all to goddamn hell. Fucking erase this piece of shit fucking shell of a site, it doesn’t deserve the name of the noble Total Frat Move which stood against geed and liberalism. Fucking run to Bacon and hide under his g.ayfriendly skirt like a true TFM coward.
    Who built TFM? I did! Who rallied the world to arms in the greatest single effort this goddamn place has ever seen? I did! I am the true and righteous hero of TFM! Without me there is only darkness, evil, and Dorn. I am everything we supposedly wanted to save about this site; the last shining beacon of hope. I am TFM!

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -1

      I’m a KU fan and hate Mizzou but why do ignorant SEC fans think they will get their shit stomped in the SEC? Mizzou will go 8-4 or 9-3 every year just like they do virtually every year in Big 12. Sure they’ve had years going 7-5 but also one year going 11-2. They play in the SEC LEAST. All they have do is beat Georgia, lord knows an overrated team every year. Obviously Mizzou will get destroyed at home by Bama, but after that SEC homers are ridiculous if they believe Florida who couldn’t score on a high school team last year, USC with a hurt running back and no QB, and any of those other three teams UT UK and Vandy, who should probably start getting ready for ball season, could beat Mizzou. Mizzou is lucky they don’t have the powerful Miss St. and Miss on their schedule. The Sec has 3 good teams, one QB, and they all play in West

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -5

      Mizzou is one of six teams in the BCS conferences to have won at least 8 games in each of the last 6 seasons. I’m sure they can win 9 games in 3 seasons.

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
  2. 3

    There are a few major things you are leaving out.

    While i know football is at the forefront of the decision – if you look at all around sports rankings (The directors cup) A&M is consistantly around the top ten, with the only SEC school ahead of it as Florida.

    Also A&M is in a league above almost all of the SEC (exceptions being Vandy and Florida(ish)) in academics – if anything, aggies are worried about their reputation being dragged down to the levels of the Alabamas, Mississippi States of the world.

    Lastly, SEC schools dont need to have the air that they are saving A&M from some sort of monetary dispair. A&M is one of the top ten schools in the nation in terms of wealth. They have an endowment fund of over 7 BILLION. That is more than double second place vandy and about 7 times the majority of the other SEC schools.

    With that said, Im pumped for the move and think it will be a great partnership, but if A&M were a pledge, it would be that one pledge that the actives cant wait to initiate because they know he’ll be a credit to them all.

    again….7 billion

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
  3. 2

    The Big XII went to shit when the Big 8 expanded to pick up the Texas schools. Missouri and A&M jumped ship because with Colorado and Nebraska leaving, it appeared the conference was crumbling apart. Can’t blame either school for wanting stability

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
  4. 2

    – .638 winning percentage
    – 3 national championships
    – 8 Conference titles

    compared to A&M statistics, that’s not saying much

    Also props to A&M’s new freshman QB getting arrested for being in a fight at a bar and presenting 2 different fake ID’s to police

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
  5. 1
    Fraterick Southgate

    Another brave (not really) prediction: OU wins the Big 12, and I get insanely drunk in Dallas’ West End and possibly end up in jail the night before OU/TX.

    Kansas State and West Virginia also impress.

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
  6. 0

    It’s a shame that the SEC didn’t make a run at Virginia Tech. They would have gotten a better market in Virginia (12th most populated state in US, largest state without a NFL team) and the DC market. Va Tech is unquestionably a better football program than A&M and Mizzou. Also, Frank Beamer is a legendary southern college football coach that would have fit in perfectly with the other SEC coaches.

    ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • 2
      Will Fratchamp

      OXinyourBox- you’ve made a good argument for including Va Tech in the SEC and I’m sure the conference has already attempted to pursue the Hokies. However, here are some rebuttals to consider:

      1. Va Tech has stated in the past they have no interest in joining the SEC. Their reason? Well remember when Miami left the Big East, Va Tech wanted out as well. Since UVA and the ACC helped rescue the program from the Big East fiasco, Va Tech has felt beholden to the conference.

      2. Yes, having Va Tech would strengthen the DC market, however it wouldn’t be much of an addition. Despite having 2 ACC teams, Virginia is still big into SEC football. It’s like saying the SEC would add the North Carolina market by adding UNC, Wake, Duke, or NC State. Adding a state like Virginia or North Carolina is simply overkill, but adding markets like Texas and Missouri further expands the SEC’s reach into Big 12 territory. The ACC sucks. I used to live in DC and no one gave a shit about Maryland football. They only care about the Redskins.

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -1

      I only care about the past 20 years (as do most recruits) when talking about which programs are better…it’s like with nba basketball, nobody gives a shit about what happen before Jordan’s bulls.

      Great for Tennessee that they won a bunch of games when our dads went to college, but you ask the average college football fan if va tech or Tennessee is better football program, they would say va tech by a wide margin…the only people who would say otherwise are Tennessee fans (and maybe UVA fans)…plus va tech SMASHED Tennessee in the peach bowl a couple of years ago.

      UGA and Ark are probably in the same ballpark as tech so I could see where you’re coming from but i would respectfully disagree with you that they’re better programs.

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -2
      colonial ft soldier

      Wrong. Tennessee is the 2nd winningest program in SEC history, and Georgia is always in the mix. Arkansas has a great history as well. Va Tech wasn’t even relevant until the 90’s.

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -3

      Also, the only programs that are more prestigious (in terms of football) than Va Tech in the SEC are Alabama, LSU, Florida and Auburn.

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago
    • -3

      @Will Fratchamp, I agree with that Virginia Tech “owes” the ACC but since it was such a bitch for them to get in the conference in the first place, they shouldn’t feel any remorse in leaving the conference. It’s different if one of the “Tobacco Road” schools leave because they are the reason why ACC is a worthwhile conference in the first place. If they didn’t want you in the conference to begin with, I say fuck ’em and make the best decision for your own school.

      I’m not saying bringing in A&M and Mizzou into the SEC were bad moves. But for me personally, I’d rather have the flagship program in VA than the “little brother” program in TX. A&M will always be in the shadow of UT and they have to compete with Texas Tech, TCU and UH. Nobody cares about Maryland football in DC because Maryland football fucking sucks.

      You’re right, the ACC fucking sucks…out of the schools that matter, two of them haven’t been good in ten years (Miami & FSU), two of them choke every year (VT and Clemson), one is fucked for a really long time (UNC) and the other runs the least fan-friendly offense in college football (Georgia Tech).

      ^ ThisTake a lapReply • 3 years ago

Load More

1 2 3