Random Photo

Email this to a friend

Nice Move
ADVERTISEMENT

Comments

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or create an account.

  1. 0
    SassySigma1874

    This is fucking brilliant, but I’m a little incredulous nonetheless. I want some Photoshop investigation to verify the integrity of this photograph. Besides, in order to get that close to Barack Saddam Hussein Obama Bin Laden, I suspect one would probably need to drown himself in holy water.

    ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago
  2. -1
    247frat

    I’d take Paul over Obama in a heartbeat if he gets the GOP nomination, but he would not be as good as Newt or–hate to say this–Romney.

    I read through his proposed foreign policy and I just couldn’t get the images of the World Trade Center burning out of my mind.

    ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago
    • 1
      Mr Sir

      Not elect a candidate based on hindsight?

      “Yeah, he was correct on everything he said was going to happen, and offered the solutions to prevent it from happening. But come on man… that’s so obvious now!”

      Thank you for respectively disagreeing with me. YouTube “Ron Paul on [insert word here]” and have your eyes opened.

      ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago
    • -3
      247frat

      Mr Sir,

      In addition to respectfully disagreeing with your statement, I must also point out to you that electing Paul based on hindsight is not a good idea. It’s debatable whether his foreign policy would have been better in 2001, but we’ve reached a certain degree of “no going back.”

      Isolationism is fine if your nation is self-sustaining, but we depend far too much on other countries for our needs, not to mention our massive debt to China. Simply withdrawing will have economic ramifications as well as political ones.

      I don’t even want to get into our relationship is Israel in this regard, especially considering that Iran and Syria consider Israel and the US as one entity when it comes to their political terrorism goals.

      ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago
    • -4
      FuckLiberals69

      ^He doesn’t advocate isolationism. It’s called non-interventionism, and yes, there is a big fucking difference. Your argument about economically depending on China, holds no weight because Ron Paul is the most pro free trade of all the candidates. You should probably stop depending on Bill O’ Reiley to tell you wheat to believe and do your own damn research.

      ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago
  3. -1
    Mike_Hawk

    Must be photoshopped, he’s wearing an Obama pin, and no true fratstar (which this guy would totally be) would wear a suit that looked that shitty, this guys a geed.

    ^ ThisTake a lapLog in or sign up to reply. • 5 years ago

Load More