======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ===== ==== ====== ====== ===== ==== ======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ===== ==== ====== ====== ===== ====
Remember when I said Nina Agdal was much, much hotter than Kate Upton? A bunch of you smarter people agreed with me, but then there were a few who said I was an idiot. For those in the latter group, I bet you feel really stupid now, don’t you?
That’s a thoroughbred, people.
Ever see the 1985 movie Weird Science? It’s about a couple nerdy high school kids that design their idea of the perfect woman on a computer, then blammo, she appears in real form. She was sexy as hell. Well, that 1985 IBM piece of trash wasn’t capable of creating anything like what we’re seeing from Nina Agdal. She looks like she was designed in a lab, but a current, state-of-the-art one. Nothing is out of place on her.
Upton takes her down in the chest beefers department (and basically every other woman on the planet), but Agdal doesn’t have the requisite hefty frame like Kate does to lug those bad boys around, and that’s a good thing.
As you can see there’s another girl in the .gif with Nina — Sports Illustrated model Ariel Meredith. Now, she has a lot of nice things going on for her, but she’s much too young and much too skinny to be serving up flapjacks already. It’s kind of concerning. I’d still take her for a walk in the park if you know what I’m saying, but I’m just saying.
To compare, here is Kate from last week: