Terrorism is an asymmetric threat to the security of States
And in order to eliminate these threats to international security, it is necessary to create new national and international structures, which, in turn, operate asymmetrically throughout society according to three main plans:
the development of a legislative environment that will allow the authorities to effectively combat the reduction of criminal and extremist activities.;
international cooperation;
support scientists in the search for suitable weapons, tools, tactics and strategies.
These structures should be similar to those of terrorist groups: recognition units; rapid reaction forces; fun units; propaganda; training; leadership; financial; logistical support and possibly medical.
Both the consequences of attacks and the constant threat can lead to profound changes in terms of the psychosocial properties (cohesion, climate, consumption, efficiency, traditions, etc.) of Groups of people, but also at the level of the corresponding condition (decreased consensus and solidarity). national, the appearance and manifestation of social unrest and disobedience, expression of opinions contrary to generally accepted social norms and changes in behavioral patterns characteristic of the country).
Thus, people voluntarily give up travel and other freedoms for fear of attacks, harming the tourism economy and at the same time countries or companies. The gap is a physical asymmetry that speaks volumes.
Thus, there is an asymmetry in the means used, which allow advanced technologies to adapt to such conflicts.
In addition, the publicity of actions will suffer in terms of the ability to share data with the general public, given the need for special protection offered to their own forces.
Emphasizing the idea of asymmetry, it is important to recall the volume entitled "The War of the Future, the Future of War," in which the authors refer to Soda Bedar and who believes that there are three levels of confrontation in military strategy.:
• symmetry, which includes the armed confrontation of two forces, approximately equal in development, composition and reserve;
• dissymmetry, which implies the quantitative and/or qualitative superiority of one of the parties;
• Asymmetry, which means gaining an advantage by exploiting the opponent's weaknesses and vulnerabilities and avoiding his strengths. Buy effexor xr , go to our pharmacy!
